A comparison of French online exam platforms

Evalmee against TestWe, Evaluo, Mereos, Evalbox, Managexam and Theia: seven platforms published in France, the ones you meet in French higher education tenders. Fifteen criteria, every cell sourced on the vendor's own page with the date it was read — including when the answer is "not publicly documented".

Sources verified on 14 August 2026 on each vendor's public pages.

How this comparison is built

  • Every cell about a competitor cites the vendor page on which the information was read, and the date it was read. Nothing is taken from a third-party comparison, a software directory or a press release.
  • When a vendor does not publicly document a capability, the cell says "not publicly documented". This is not a "no": it is an absence of information, and the distinction changes a purchasing decision.
  • Evalmee's capabilities are sourced the same way, on the public pages of this site — including when the honest answer is "not publicly documented", and including when it counts against us.
  • Four cells in the Evalmee column carry no link. They state capabilities the vendor confirms and that our own product pages, written from a help centre that has fallen behind, describe badly or not at all. Pointing at them would be citing a page that says something else; the link will come back when those pages are up to date.
  • Two symmetrical sections set out the situations in which Evalmee is the right choice and those in which it is not, and which platform to look at instead. Both are held to the same standard: a verifiable capability, what the six others do or do not document on the same date, and nothing else. A comparison that wins every row teaches nobody anything.
  • The scope is deliberately French: these seven platforms are published in France and address French higher education. International players belong in a separate comparison, one we have in mind but have not dated — rather than in a column bolted on here without the same verification.
A comparison of seven French online assessment platforms — Evalmee, TestWe, Evaluo, Mereos, Evalbox, Managexam and Theia — across fifteen criteria: nature of the product, pricing, trial, question types, AI marking, remote proctoring, device lockdown, installation, offline mode, LTI, single sign-on, data hosting, accessibility and exam adjustments. Every cell cites its source and the date it was verified.
CriterionEvalmeeTestWeEvaluoMereosEvalboxManagexamTheia
Nature of the productComplete platform: authoring, delivery, proctoring, marking and analytics.
The Evalmee product
E-exam platform built on an app you install, with offline sittings.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Written and oral exam platform, with an invigilator network and formal incident reports.
evaluo.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
A proctoring layer added to an existing tool, not an authoring platform.
mereos.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Online MCQ software, with automatic marking of scanned paper exams.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
A delivery and remote proctoring layer for written and oral exams; the papers go back to the institution, which marks them.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
Complete assessment platform: paper authoring, delivery, marking and analysis of the results.
theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Public price listPublished: Mini, Pro and Max by the month; Organisation on quotation.
Evalmee pricing
Not published: no pricing page, calls to action lead to booking a meeting.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not published: four named plans, each with a "Request a quote" button.
evaluo.eu/nos-offres — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not published: a pay-as-you-go model is described, with no figures at all.
mereos.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Published: free plan, credit packs from €0.01 per paper, unlimited use from €2.50 a month.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Published, pay-as-you-go and with no subscription: Proctor Photo from €0.50, Proctor Vidéo from €4, Proctor Review and Soutenance (oral defence) from €5.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not published: three named plans, EVAL Plus, EVAL Pro and PROCTORING, with no figures at all; every button leads to the contact form.
theia.fr/nos-plans — verified 14 Aug 2026
Self-serve sign-up and free trialOnline sign-up and a 14-day free trial, no credit card.
Evalmee pricing
Not publicly documented: the site offers a login and a meeting request form.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: the routes offered are a demo and a quote request.
evaluo.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Trial advertised without a credit card, but opened through a contact form.
mereos.eu/free-trial — verified 14 Aug 2026
Immediate account creation: "no credit card needed, no commitment".
examiner.evalbox.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: the site offers nothing but a demo or quote request.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: neither online account creation nor a trial period.
theia.fr/nos-plans — verified 14 Aug 2026
Documented question typesTen types: four closed ones marked automatically, six open ones marked by a human. Code, Spoken and Matching are in beta. AI-assisted import from Word, PDF, Excel and images.
Exam creation
MCQ, single choice, open answers, matching, essays, recorded spoken answers.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
MCQ and single choice, open answer, case study, audio comprehension, image and video in the prompt.
evaluo.eu/examen-ecrit — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: the site advertises "multi-format assessments" without detailing them.
mereos.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
"Every question type that allows automatic marking": MCQ, single choice, true/false, fill-in-the-blanks.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
MCQ, multiple-response questions, open questions, case studies, oral defences and language tests; audio, video, PDF, spreadsheets and images inside the papers.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
Eight documented types: single answer, multiple response, essay, short open answer, matching, numeric value, image zoning and drop-down menu; plus dossiers progressifs (progressive clinical cases) and tests de concordance de script (script concordance tests).
support.theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
AI-assisted marking of written answersOn written answers: the assistant proposes points and feedback, and the marker approves before the mark moves. Data anonymised, processing inside the European Union.
AI marking
"Assisted marking — Beta": the AI assistant proposes the marking of papers.
testwe.eu/assistant-ia — verified 14 Aug 2026
The AI proposes a mark with a confidence score; the teacher validates or adjusts.
evaluo.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not offered: Mereos' AI detects cheating and "delivers no judgement".
mereos.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: automatic marking covers closed questions only.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: all that is described is automatic detection of anomalies and of similarities between papers, which belongs to anti-cheating.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: AI appears as a line of the EVAL Pro plan, with no description of any marking of written answers.
theia.fr/nos-plans — verified 14 Aug 2026
Automated proctoringFull screen enforced, screen-exit alerts, event-triggered screenshots, webcam and microphone optional. A fraud risk score is computed, and the signals are gathered into integrity reports."Intelligent algorithms that detect suspicious behaviour", in synchronous or asynchronous mode.
testwe.eu/telesurveillance — verified 14 Aug 2026
AI proctoring agent, offered within the Proctoring Live plan.
evaluo.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Every session gets an integrity score; no facial recognition, citing the CNIL's recommendations.
mereos.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Anti-cheating algorithms on screen activity; no webcam or video recording documented.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Random webcam photos in asynchronous mode, recording reviewed afterwards with "robotic checks", detection of anomalies and of similarities between papers.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
PROCTORING plan: webcam, audio detection and recording, screen captures, suspicious behaviour detection and an incident review interface.
theia.fr/nos-plans — verified 14 Aug 2026
Live human invigilationLive tracking dashboard: each participant's status, answers and screen exits. Identity verification is done by the examiner, not by an AI.
Monitoring and proctoring
Synchronous mode advertised; the human setup itself is not publicly documented.
testwe.eu/telesurveillance — verified 14 Aug 2026
Run by your teams or by Evaluo's network, advertised at more than 200 invigilators.
evaluo.eu/proctoring-live — verified 14 Aug 2026
Absent, and documented as such: "none of our solutions requires the presence of an invigilator".
mereos.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Real-time screen monitoring console, run by the examiner.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Yes: real-time video invigilation "by a Managexam invigilator or your own", and oral defence before a panel.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: the incident review interface is described, but not who runs it, nor whether an invigilator follows the session live.
theia.fr/nos-plans — verified 14 Aug 2026
Device lockdown during the examNo lockdown browser: that role is filled by an optional desktop application. Copy-paste and the presence of a second screen are detected."Computer lockdown during the exam", delivered by the installed app.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
In the browser: screen locking, copy-paste blocking and second-screen detection.
evaluo.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Lockdown entirely inside the browser: forced full screen, second screen detected, tabs, printing and shortcuts disabled.
mereos.eu/lockdown-browser — verified 14 Aug 2026
"Mechanism to prevent jumping to another window during the MCQ", without locking down the device.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: no device or browser lockdown mechanism is described.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
Chrome extension compulsory when it is switched on: forced full screen, new tabs and the Escape key blocked, desktop switching detected.
support.theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
App to install on the candidate's deviceA Windows and macOS desktop application exists, without being mandatory: it makes the candidate's experience simpler, and the exam remains accessible from a browser.Yes: Windows 10+ and macOS 10.15+ app; iPad, iPhone, Android, Chromebook and Linux listed as unsupported.
support.testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
None: an up-to-date Chrome, Edge or Firefox is enough; tablets are not compatible with screen monitoring.
evaluo.eu — requirements, verified 14 Aug 2026
None: "accessible with no software", the central argument of the product.
mereos.eu/plateforme — verified 14 Aug 2026
None: "accessible online anywhere, with no installation required", including on tablet and smartphone.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
"Inclusive solution compatible with every operating system and every browser"; no installation is documented on the site.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
None: a SaaS solution "compatible with all browsers", with no installation, usable in BYOD.
support.theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Fully offline sittingWorking offline is possible. The paper is not downloaded ahead of time: it is loaded when the exam opens.Yes: "students download their papers in advance" and sit offline, with remote proctoring still active.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented; the requirements call for 2 to 4 Mb/s throughout the exam.
evaluo.eu — requirements, verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented; a minimum throughput of 256 Kbps is advertised.
mereos.eu/plateforme — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented; the alternative offered is a paper exam, scanned and marked automatically.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented; the candidates page requires the opposite, a stable network, with at least 500 KB/s on the live plan.
managexam.com/candidats — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented; only the resumption of a session after a disconnection is mentioned.
theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
LMS and LTI integrationLTI 1.3, with Moodle, Canvas and Blackboard whose full cycle is documented; Brightspace and Insendi case by case.
Evalmee integrations
Integration advertised with Moodle, Blackboard and Canvas; "API/LTI" cited with no version or technical documentation.
testwe.eu/partenaires — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: no product page mentions LTI or names an LMS.
evaluo.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
LMS integration advertised generically; neither LTI, Moodle, Canvas nor Blackboard is named.
mereos.eu/extension — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: no LTI, Moodle, Canvas or Blackboard anywhere on the site.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: no LTI, Moodle, Canvas or Blackboard on the public pages.
managexam.com — verified 14 Aug 2026
LTI 1.3 named, with Moodle and Canvas: launch from the course and marks returned to the gradebook; LTI 1.1 fallback for Moodle versions before 3.7.
theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Single sign-on (SSO)Four documented providers: Google, Microsoft 365 and Azure AD, CAS, OneLogin. Set up by the team, with no self-configuration screen.
Evalmee integrations
Not publicly documented: no mention of SSO, SAML, CAS, Shibboleth or OpenID Connect.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
"SSO" cited once, with no protocol; no SAML, CAS, Shibboleth or OpenID Connect.
evaluo.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented.
mereos.eu/plateforme — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: only email invitations and named credentials are described.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: no federated protocol cited; the FAQ states that the email address serves as the username.
managexam.com/faq — verified 14 Aug 2026
Azure AD, JWT, SAML and CAS documented in the help centre; setting up CAS goes through support.
support.theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Data hostingFrance: Scaleway and AWS eu-west-3, with no replication outside Europe. The ISO 27001 cited is the host's; no HDS, no SecNumCloud.
Security & GDPR
AWS servers in Île-de-France; data "in France or in European Union member countries".
support.testwe.eu — GDPR, verified 14 Aug 2026
"Stored in France, with OVH"; impact assessment carried out, AES-256 encryption.
evaluo.eu — personal data, verified 14 Aug 2026
AWS data centres in the European Union; hosting in France is not claimed.
mereos.eu — data protection, verified 14 Aug 2026
The legal notice names "Amazon Web Services LLC, Seattle, WA, USA" as the host.
evalbox.fr — legal notice, verified 14 Aug 2026
The legal notice names two French hosts: OVH, in Roubaix, and Scaleway, in Paris.
managexam.com — legal notice, verified 14 Aug 2026
"Secure servers in Europe": the privacy policy names AWS for the platform and OVH for the backups. Hosting in France is not claimed.
theia.fr — privacy policy, verified 14 Aug 2026
RGAA accessibility statementNot publicly documented: no RGAA accessibility statement is published to date.Accessibility options advertised (screen readers, vision, hearing); no RGAA statement or compliance rate.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
No RGAA statement; the site states "although not fully accessible".
evaluo.eu — accessibility, verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented.
mereos.eu/plateforme — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: no accessibility statement and no compliance rate.
managexam.com/candidats — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: RGAA compliance appears only in a blog post, as a recommendation to the market, not as a property of the product.
theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Exam adjustments and extra timeTiers temps (extra time) attached to the participant's profile and applied automatically; extra time can also be granted on the spot during the exam.
Delivery and sessions
Not publicly documented: no mention of extra time or of any exam adjustment.
testwe.eu — verified 14 Aug 2026
"Adjustments such as extra time are built in natively"; duration adjustable per candidate.
evaluo.eu — accessibility, verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented.
mereos.eu/plateforme — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented; only a time limit per question is described.
evalbox.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: no mention of extra time or of any exam adjustment.
managexam.com/candidats — verified 14 Aug 2026
Not publicly documented: no product page describes how extra time is handled.
theia.fr — verified 14 Aug 2026

"Not publicly documented" means that the vendor's public pages, consulted on 14 August 2026, do not cover the subject. It does not mean the capability does not exist: it means it cannot be verified without going through a salesperson. A correction or an update from a vendor is welcome — write to us and the row will be changed.

When Evalmee is the right choice

Six situations in which Evalmee is the one to look at, held to the same standard as the section below: a capability we have, what the six others do or do not document on the same date, and nothing else. A case that could not be stated as precisely as the ones against us is not here.

  • Your exams carry a lot of written answers

    Closed questions mark themselves everywhere, Evalbox included. What costs time is the written answers. Evalmee documents six such types, marked by a human, with an assistant that proposes marks and feedback and waits for the marker's approval before the grade moves, and with anonymous marking of papers. Of the seven, only TestWe and Evaluo publicly document an equivalent assisted marking; Mereos rules it out explicitly, and Evalbox, Managexam and Theia do not document it.

  • You want the exam to start from your LMS and the grade to come back to it

    An Evalmee activity is created inside the course space, open to teachers and students alike. On click, the user is redirected to Evalmee already signed in; the exam itself runs on Evalmee, outside the LMS, and the teacher can send the grades back into the course gradebook. The path is continuous enough that a candidate need not notice they changed tool: they start from their course and find their grade there. This is LTI 1.3, and of the seven, only Theia also names it; TestWe cites "API/LTI" with no version and no technical documentation, Mereos advertises a generic LMS integration, and Evaluo, Evalbox and Managexam document neither LTI nor any named LMS.

  • You need to adjust a candidate's time during the exam

    Extra time (tiers-temps) is attached to the participant's profile and applied automatically, and further time can be granted while the exam is running — for a technical incident, a hardware failure, or an adjustment decided that same morning. Of the seven, only Evaluo also documents duration adjustments natively; the other five do not document them publicly. For a disability office handling adjustments all year round, the difference is a daily one.

  • You want integrity signals without imposing a lockdown browser

    Evalmee does not lock the machine down: the Windows and macOS desktop app is optional, and the exam can still be sat from a browser. The signals are there all the same — enforced full screen, focus loss, copy-paste, second screen, a fraud risk score and integrity reports — and the decision stays with the examiner. That is an architectural choice, not a gap: if candidates sit on their own machines, or if you cannot have anything installed, TestWe rests on a mandatory app and Theia on a Chrome extension when its anti-fraud setup is enabled.

  • Your data must stay hosted in France

    Evalmee declares Scaleway and the Paris AWS region, with no replication outside Europe. Of the seven, Evaluo, Managexam and TestWe also claim France; Mereos declares the European Union and Theia declares Europe, neither claiming France, and Evalbox's legal notice names a host located in Seattle. If your requirement goes further — HDS certification for health data, SecNumCloud for sensitive use — we hold neither, and it is better to know that before writing the specification.

  • You want to try before speaking to a salesperson

    Sign-up happens online, the trial runs for 14 days and asks for no card, and the price list is published: Mini at €19 excl. VAT a month, then Pro and Max, with the Organisation plan on quotation. Of the seven, only Evalbox and Managexam also publish their amounts; TestWe, Evaluo, Mereos and Theia all point to a quotation, demo or meeting form. To build a budget or test a tool before opening a consultation, the difference is practical before it is commercial.

When Evalmee is not the right choice

Six situations in which another platform answers your need better than ours. They come out of the same checks as the table above, and they will only change if the facts change.

  • You need the vendor to supply the invigilators

    Evaluo advertises a network of more than 200 invigilators and offers to run invigilation on your behalf. Evalmee supplies the proctoring tools, not the invigilators: an introduction to an invigilation network remains possible should the need arise, but it is not an offer in our catalogue. If you are looking for an invigilation service carried by the vendor and described as such, Evaluo is the one to look at.

  • Your papers already live elsewhere and you only want to secure them

    If your exams are authored and delivered in your LMS and all you are looking for is to add a proctoring layer without changing authoring tool, a proctoring component such as Mereos — or Evaluo's remote proctoring on its own — answers the need more directly than a complete platform: you do not pay for the functions you will never use. Two trade-offs, to be weighed rather than settled. A layer added on top covers how the session runs: the paper itself stays where it is written and kept, under the rules of the tool that hosts it. And the usual objection — moving the papers costs too much — weighs less than it did: AI-assisted import accepts Word, PDF, Excel and images, and the activity created inside the course makes the change all but invisible to teachers and candidates alike. The arbitration is between paying less and not adding yet another disconnected tool.

  • You work alone, your exams are MCQs, and the budget is marginal

    Evalbox publishes a free plan and unlimited use advertised from €2.50 a month, for automatically marked questions only. If the budget is nil, the question is settled. If it is not quite nil, the arbitration is worth putting: Evalmee's Mini plan is published at €19 excl. VAT a month, or €9 excl. VAT a month on annual billing, covers the same MCQs and adds written answers and their marking. What that gap buys is time: the time to author and set up the exam, the time to mark it, and the time to process and key in the grades, which is usually the most thankless of the three. It is time an adjunct bills against their contract and a permanent member of staff does not spend on their research. What that time is worth where you are, only you know: we will not put a figure on it for you.

  • Your exams are dossiers progressifs or tests de concordance de script

    Theia documents eight question types, among them image zoning and numeric value, and two formats specific to health studies: dossiers progressifs (progressive clinical cases) and tests de concordance de script (script concordance tests). Evalmee offers neither. For a health faculty whose exams rest on those formats, the question is already settled.

  • You proctor one session a year and refuse any subscription

    Managexam publishes a pay-as-you-go price list with no subscription: photo remote proctoring starts at €0.50 per candidate and video invigilation at €4. Evalmee bills by the month, and the month is a billing cycle in its own right: nothing forces you to take the year, a single month covers a single session, and the plan can be changed at any time. The comparison still is not played on the same ground — Managexam bills the proctored candidate, we bill the month. For an institution that runs a single proctored session in the year, on a small cohort, paying per use remains the simpler arithmetic, and we have nothing to set against it.

  • You require an RGAA accessibility statement from your supplier

    None of the seven platforms in this comparison, Evalmee included, publishes an accessibility statement compliant with the RGAA as at the date of this verification. If that is a requirement of your public tender, make it an explicit point of the consultation and ask every bidder for an audit — us as much as the others.

The platforms compared

Who publishes what, with the legal identity each one publishes. A vendor that publishes its registration number is a vendor you can check.

TestWe

Published by TESTWE, a société par actions simplifiée registered with the Paris trade register under number 801 731 571, with its registered office at 27 boulevard Saint-Martin in Paris. The product is built on an app installed on Windows or macOS, and puts offline exam sittings front and centre.

testwe.eu — legal notice, verified 14 Aug 2026

Evaluo

Published by Evaluo SAS, registered with the Paris trade register under number B 894 945 690, with its registered office at 27 rue du Chemin-Vert in Paris. A written and oral exam platform, backed by a network of invigilators and offering three levels of remote proctoring: photo, record-and-review, and live.

evaluo.eu — legal notice, verified 14 Aug 2026

Mereos

Published by DT Education SAS, registered with the Paris trade register under number 820 844 348. Mereos is not an authoring vendor: its three products — lockdown browser, web app and extension — are proctoring layers added on top of an existing tool.

mereos.eu — legal notice, verified 14 Aug 2026

Evalbox

Published by INDUCIDO SAS, SIRET 79766249100019. Online MCQ software, together with a paper mode where papers are scanned and marked automatically. The usage statistics shown on its home page are dated November 2015.

evalbox.fr — legal notice, verified 14 Aug 2026

Managexam

Published by Managexam, SASU registered with the Montpellier trade register under number 852 034 230, with its registered office at 450 rue Baden Powell in Montpellier. A delivery and remote proctoring layer rather than a complete platform: the papers go back to the institution, which marks them. The company advertises more than 120,000 exams run.

managexam.com — legal notice, verified 14 Aug 2026

Theia

Published by Theia, a société par actions simplifiée registered with the Paris trade register under number 501 843 015, with its registered office at 9 rue des Colonnes in Paris. A complete assessment platform, and the publisher of the tool historically used by SIDES and Uness. It advertises more than 110 client institutions.

theia.fr — legal notice, verified 14 Aug 2026

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

How is this comparison verified?

Every cell about a competitor was read on a public vendor page on 14 August 2026, and that page is linked from the cell itself along with the date it was read. Nothing is taken from a third-party comparison or a software directory. Evalmee's capabilities are sourced the same way, on the public pages of this site, including when the answer counts against us.

What does "not publicly documented" mean?

It means that the vendor's public pages, consulted on 14 August 2026, do not cover the subject. It is not a "no": the capability may well exist, but it cannot be verified without going through a salesperson. The distinction matters, because an undocumented capability cannot be held against a supplier in a public tender.

Which platform should I choose if exams have to run offline?

TestWe is the only one of the seven to publicly document downloading the paper in advance and sitting the exam offline, with remote proctoring maintained when there is no network. Evalmee works offline without its product pages describing it yet, and does not download the paper ahead of time: it is loaded when the exam opens. Managexam requires the opposite, a stable network, and Theia describes nothing more than the resumption of a session after a disconnection.

Do these platforms publish their prices?

Three out of seven. Evalmee publishes its monthly price list, Evalbox a free plan and unlimited use from €2.50 a month, and Managexam a pay-as-you-go price list with no subscription, from €0.50 to €5 per candidate depending on the proctoring mode. TestWe, Evaluo, Mereos and Theia publish no figures at all: their pricing pages lead to a quote, demo or meeting request form.

Which of them host data in France?

Four of the seven claim France. Evalmee states Scaleway and the AWS Paris region, with no replication outside Europe. Evaluo states storage in France with OVH. Managexam names OVH in Roubaix and Scaleway in Paris. TestWe states AWS servers in Île-de-France, with a policy mentioning France or the European Union. Theia advertises servers in Europe and names AWS and OVH, without claiming France. Mereos states the European Union without claiming France. Evalbox states, in its legal notice, a host located in Seattle in the United States.

Check for yourself

The best test of a comparison is still your own exam. Build one in a few minutes.